Savaterra’s receptory site in Kemi

Conclusions of thermal treatment

  • High capacity (40-80t/h) allows reasonable time schedules in bigger projects
  • Post treatment monitoring is minimal
  • Versatility of the method allows high variation of the contamination level and compounds in the input material
  • The method is quite insentive of the moisture and soil type of the input material
  • The space requirement is low (40m*60m)
  • Comparison of the total costs to other treatment methods, make thermal treatment very attractive alternative
  • Emission control and mass balance are easy to make